What aircraft type is this? I.D., please....
#3
Posted 11 April 2009 - 1508 PM
DKTanker, on Sat 11 Apr 2009 1951, said:
Maybe, but most images I'm finding show SU-5 as four-bladed and with bigger intake, different nose.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/ac/Sukhoi_Su-5.jpg
http://upload.wikime...Sukhoi_Su-5.jpg
http://www.sukhoi.or...nes/museum/su5/
http://img71.imageshack.us/img71/7896/su54645423xm5.jpg
...it looks more "YAK"ish, but none of these are a fit either...(lot's of interesting aircraft here, though)
http://rareaircraf1....con.us/USSR.htm
This post has been edited by Doug Kibbey: 11 April 2009 - 1518 PM
#4
Posted 11 April 2009 - 1519 PM
Doug Kibbey, on Sat 11 Apr 2009 1508, said:
I agree and on closer inspection it looks like it has a closely cowled radial or cowl as on the Fw190D. It isn't of course. It is also possible (probable?) that it is a turbo-prop.
#5
Posted 11 April 2009 - 1522 PM
DKTanker, on Sat 11 Apr 2009 2019, said:
No idea. But looking at the SU-5 was educational for me...it's both convention reciprocating engine and jet powered, apparently. Never seen that type before either.
The lower intake cowl on the plane I posted question about looks like liquid cooling system housing, to my eyes. So I'm thinking reciprocating.
#11
Posted 11 April 2009 - 1536 PM
http://rareaircraf1.greyfalcon.us/
WARNING! Don't go here unless you've got some time on your hands....
#13
Posted 11 April 2009 - 1540 PM
Doug Kibbey, on Sat 11 Apr 2009 2136, said:
http://rareaircraf1.greyfalcon.us/
WARNING! Don't go here unless you've got some time on your hands....
Wow. Will have to make some free time now ;)
edit: The Flying Panzerfausts :lol:
This post has been edited by eurico_viegas: 11 April 2009 - 1542 PM
#15
Posted 11 April 2009 - 2104 PM
DKTanker, on Sat 11 Apr 2009 2353, said:
http://rareaircraf1.greyfalcon.us/picturesk/aa22.jpg
When did the Thunderbirds become inspiration for real technology, between this and the piloted A-4 rockets? (I know, its the other way around)
I don't know whats more amazing/unbelievable/stark raving mad: if German late WW2 projects if Soviet Cold War projects (thinking wing-in-ground effect things mainly, although those worked) :blink:
Oh, and Western non-Harrier VSTOL attempts also fit that mould, IMO. Even the VJ-101, a cool looking plane as it is, but completely absurd. All of this in hindsight of course. ;)
edit: forgot there is more than one flavor of A-4 :)
This post has been edited by eurico_viegas: 11 April 2009 - 2117 PM
#16
Posted 11 April 2009 - 2118 PM
eurico_viegas, on Sun 12 Apr 2009 0204, said:
I don't know whats more amazing/unbelievable/stark raving mad: if German late WW2 projects if Soviet Cold War projects (thinking wing-in-ground effect things mainly, although those worked) :blink:
Oh, and Western non-Harrier VSTOL attempts also fit that mould, IMO. Even the VJ-101, a cool looking plane as it is, but completely absurd. All of this in hindsight of course. ;)
Well, it's not like the West couldn't get weird. Some Brit concepts...(haven't brought myself to look at U.S. stuff yet...)
http://rareaircraf1.greyfalcon.us/picturesm/ae69.jpg
http://rareaircraf1.greyfalcon.us/picturesk/ae20.jpg
#18
Posted 12 April 2009 - 0128 AM
#19
Posted 12 April 2009 - 0218 AM
Doug Kibbey, on Sat 11 Apr 2009 2022, said:
The lower intake cowl on the plane I posted question about looks like liquid cooling system housing, to my eyes. So I'm thinking reciprocating.
Composite propulsion wasn't just for the Russkies.>
http://en.wikipedia....iki/FR_Fireball

Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote